If a picture is worth a thousand words then a scene invstigation may be worth thousands of dollars

October 25, 2011 at 7:03 am 1 comment

It’s been said that a picture is worth a thousand words.  When it comes to insurance claims it can be worth thousands of dollars.  

During my tenure as a Quality Assurance Director for a large multinational insurer, I was surprised at the frequency of claim files lacking a quality scene investigation.   In many cases, even a trip to Bing Maps or Google Earth would have sufficed, but even this was conspicuously absent.  

Coming from a school where scene investigations weren’t optional, it was always frustrating to see so much money left on the table as the result of incomplete investigations and poor liability decisions. I many instances investigations were limited to phone calls with claim parties, who themselves may not fully understand the concept of duties owed, duties breached and comparative negligence.    

Much like the X’s and O’s a football coach puts on a blackboard, the scene investigation provides the visual for both what happened and what should have happened.   From the timing of the traffic signal to  debris and skid marks, a trip to the scene of an accident provides much needed evidence to properly formulate a liability decision.  

Consider the case of an insured making a left turn and being struck by the claimant.  In far too many cases there are assessments of 100% liability against the insured.   While this may provide an easy path to closing a claim, it is extremely rare for any accident, other than a traditional rear-ender, to be all or nothing propositions.   

 

According to Jury Verdict Research, a national organization that tracks such data, rear end auto accidents accounted for only 45 percent of auto cases adjudicated, with the remainder comprised of intersection collisions, lane changes, chain reactions, and parking lot scenarios. In other words, a lot of claims where there was shared liability. 

To effectively conduct the scene investigation, it is important to gather as much information as possible.   Speaking with the insured, claimant and witnesses are all key components to gathering facts.  During these statements, which should be recorded with permission, questions should be geared towards not only what happened, but searching for possible liability mitigators.   

As discussed in Re-Adjusted: 20 Essential Rules To Take Your Claims Organization From Ordinary To Extraordinary, some such questions include direction of travel, position of the sun, weather, passengers, radio volume, cell phone usage, recognition of oncoming traffic, signal malfunction or visible obstructions.  

In the following example, consider the impact of a thorough scene investigation:

The claimant calls in a loss and says that they were going straight, had a green light and your insured turned in front of them.   A call to the insured says that they turned left because they thought there was enough time.   Far too often this is where the investigation stops.  The claim notes often reflect “Insured turned left in front of claimant, insured 100% at fault”.  But should it stop there? 

Consider the following additional facts gathered during the course of the same investigation:

1-      The speed limit was 45 and the claimant was in the #3 (outermost) of three westbound lanes.

2-      The time of loss was 6:15 p.m.   Sunset was 6:35 p.m.

3-      The light cycle was 60 seconds green and 10 seconds yellow with a 3 second delay between cycles. 

4-       The claimant was headed due west, into the sun.

5-      The claimant was an 18 year old female, who attended college and had three guest passengers.

6-      The claimant radio was on and there as active conversation in the vehicle. 

7-      The damage to the claimant vehicle was centered in the front.

8-      The damage to the insured was in the right, rear door. 

Given this additional information, the investigating adjuster would consider duties owed and duties breached by each party.   While the insured failed to yield the right of way, they did clearly establish control of the intersection, crossing three lanes in front of an inexperienced driver who may have been distracted.   While the percentages of fault may be subjective, what is evident is that this was not a clear liability accident. 

By going to the scene it is possible to visualize just how far across the intersection the insured had proceeded.   By canvassing, it is possible to find witnesses who may be able to point out other contributing factors such as speed.   It is also possible to see that that the hedgerow between east and westbound traffic may be so tall that it impedes visibility, potentially creating municipal culpability.  

In this particular case, the claimant retained an attorney.  The guest passengers retained the same attorney, which would have become a conflict of interest as soon as any fault was placed on the claimant.   As a fiduciary, it is incumbent upon the insurer to protect the financial interest of the insured, which can’t be accomplished with a marginal investigation.   This, of course, can result in actions against the insurer should there ever be a judgment in excess of the policy limits.  

Basic blocking and tackling, such as scene investigations, provides adjusters with the means by which to formulate appropriate liability decisions so as to ensure accurate settlements.    By getting back to basics and focusing on quality outcomes, insurers can quickly gain a competitive edge in the marketplace. 

Christopher Tidball is a claims consultant and the author of Re-Adjusted:20 Essential Rules To Take Your Claims Organization From Ordinary To Extraordinary.   He combines his twenty years of claims investigative and leadership experience with innovative technology to provide an immediate impact to organizational results.  To learn more, please visit www.christidball.com or e-mail chris@christidball.com

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Subrogation. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Using the right benchmarks to increase subrogation recoveries Putting the AIM in claim

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. cash software  |  November 12, 2011 at 2:59 pm

    I used to be recommended this web site through my cousin. I’m no longer certain whether this publish is written by means of him as nobody else know such specific approximately my trouble. You are incredible! Thank you!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 145 other followers

Contact the Author

Chris Tidball is a claims and revenue management consultant and author of the "20 Essential Rules" series of self and organizational improvement books. You can ask him a question at chris@christidball.com

Kicked to the Curb

Kicked to the Curb

Re-Adjusted

Finding Millions on Twitter

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.


%d bloggers like this: